IchBinAußerirdischen wrote:
If it can't be done now, it'll be done later.
Which is sort of beside the point of this thread. Modern music vs. future music et al.
Where we're more or less at right now is that we can
make Humans sound like robots rather than
make robots sound like humans.
And that I feel is the reason people feel modern music just doesn't do it for them.
But just to give an example of where the technology is at right now: most of the time you can't just slap a plugin/machine/application on a performance and let it do the job. A monkey can be taught to put Autotune on a vocal performance or to quantize a drum take "to the grid," but don't expect the results to be very good.
The reality is, even with artist examples you could think of that represent this awful-modern-music, you need a musical human telling the technology what to do for it to sound
any good.
People seem to have this misconception that the labels take a britney spears vocal take, slap some voodoo-plugin on the track and voila! It's not quite like that. The people that are paid to "correct" the vocals actually know what they are doing, compiling a final vocal take from multiple takes, applying the technology where needed and knowing when not to use it. It's still a time consuming effort and from what I can tell, these people get paid real good too.